For Consumers

For Advisers

Connect with us

Adviser Ratings

Ask an Adviser - Strategies for Tax Effective Investing Above 180K

Q&A Savings & Investments, Budgeting 09 Jan 2017

What is a suggested strategy for tax effectiveness on personal income tax if your annual income is greater than $180K? If you are in the market as a first home buyer, it is a good idea to look at an investment property instead for tax breaks?

1 Answers

Vote Answer


What is a suggested strategy for tax effectiveness on personal income tax if your annual income is greater than $180K? If you are in the market as a first home buyer, it is a good idea to look at an investment property instead for tax breaks?

Ru, as your question is primarily a taxation matter, it is important that you are aware that, although I am a registered tax (financial) adviser, I am not a qualified accountant.

With that caveat in mind, your question allows us to make two very important points.

The first is that it is generally considered unwise to make ANY financial decision primarily from the perspective of taxation, particularly attempts to reduce the amount of tax paid.

The second is that, as with most other decisions, the appropriate course of action is dependent on your personal circumstances and a number of factors not in evidence from your question.

You asked whether, if the person is a first home buyer, they should consider an investment property. I presume you mentioned “first home buyer” based on the potential to receive some of the grants and stamp duty concessions that may apply to such buyers.

If this is the case, there are two flaws with this idea. Although they vary from State to State, these benefits are generally only available for owner-occupier purchasers. This means that, not only would an investment buyer most likely not be eligible for these concessions, buying an investment property first may possibly preclude the possibility of obtaining these benefits for a subsequent owner-occupier purchase.

As a general premise, there are only two ways in which you can, legitimately, reduce your tax liability; (i) earn less or (ii) spend more (on tax deductible expenditure).

Assuming the first option is “off the table”, let’s concentrate on the second.

Spending money tax effectively means paying for tax deductible expenses; typically investment costs, business expenses or depreciable items. Contributions to superannuation are usually also tax deductible if structured correctly.

The reason tax-driven strategies are complex is that realising the potential gains from such strategies usually requires a long time-frame, typically 5-7 years, and even longer in the case of superannuation.

While nobody enjoys effectively giving every second dollar they earn in their top tax bracket to the government, and you could reasonably argue that they shouldn’t, any attempts to reduce this impost without due consideration of your entire financial situation is flirting with the prospect of extreme disappointment.

General Advice Disclaimer
Note: This advice is of a general nature only and does not take into account your personal situation and all of your objectives, your financial situation or needs. Before making any decisions you should seek advice from a professional, qualified financial adviser.
Wayne Leggett
Wayne Leggett Paramount Financial Solutions

Adv Rating 97% Cust Rating 97.68% Reviews 13



Add comment

Related articles

Renting vs Home Ownership. Which Makes Best Financial Sense?

Renting vs Home Ownership. Which Makes Best Financial Sense?

Recent years have seen housing prices in our major cities, particularly Sydney and Melbourne, reach levels which have put the dream of home ownership beyond many Australians. A recent survey found that home ownership was not a priority for 1 in 3 Australians. Rising Tide’s Founder and Managing Director, Chris Browne takes a look at the issue and points out some of the pros and cons of owning vs renting your own home.

4 votes 981 views
Budgeting, Savings & Investments, Economic update
11 Aug 2017
Is Superannuation Biased Against Women?

Is Superannuation Biased Against Women?

A recent report prepared by Per Capita in conjunction with the Australian Services Union (ASU), lead to headlines about how our superannuation system is selling women short and claims that super is biased against women. We take a look at the issue – and we’ll try to be dispassionate and not throw any petrol on the gender war fire…

5 votes 553 views
Women's finance, Superannuation, Budgeting, Savings & Investments, Aged Care
04 Aug 2017

Related Q&As

Q&A: Ask an Adviser - Is Investing In An Apartment Complex The Best Way To Secure My Retirement Income?

Greg Anderson

Top answer provided by:Greg Anderson

I'm semi- retired with a super balance of $210,000 and wish to invest $200K in a 12 unit housing complex in Esk in SE Queensland. I own the land (value $150,000). I own 4 other houses valued at $1,300,000 with a $600k mortgage. I have $75k saving, have access to $250k cash in few years and can access $150k if I sell a house now. I also have other income of Gross $36,500 pa and no dependants. I'm looking to get an income from this investment to help fund my retirement. I consider myself low-risk and would like to see a return in 5 years. Is this a good investment or is there a better way to secure retirement income?

0 votes 2 answer 266 views
Savings & Investments
17 Aug 2017

Q&A: Ask an Adviser - Difference Between Pension and Super Funds

Damian Cullen

Top answer provided by:Damian Cullen

What is the difference between a superannuation fund and a pension fund?

0 votes 1 answer 155 views
Superannuation, Savings & Investments
11 Aug 2017

Couldn’t find what you were after?

Ask advice from a financial planner

55 left
Submit question